News & Blogs
We’ve just announced more dates for our 2017/18 training programme for professionals working with single parents. Courses are booking now at a cost of £25 per session. All courses will be held at our office at 100 Wellington Street, Glasgow.
There are three half-day courses available:
- Universal Credit
- Child Maintenance Service
- Conditionality and Sanctions
Updated for 2017/18, this course is aimed at professionals who want to understand how Universal Credit will affect the single parent families they work with.
This course covers:
- Timetable for continuing rollout
- The application process
- The individual elements that make up Universal Credit
- How the calculation works
- Sanctions and Hardship payments
Basic benefit knowledge is necessary to get the most out of the session.
- Thursday, 10 August 2017 (afternoon)
- Thursday, 24 August 2017 (morning)
- Thursday, 14 September 2017 (afternoon)
- Thursday, 28 September 2017 (afternoon)
Child Maintenance Service
With Child Support Agency cases being closed, parents will have to make a decision whether to opt for a family-based arrangement or use the statutory Child Maintenance Service for which there is a charge. This course will help professionals understand how the system works and prepare parents for the choices they will have to make.
This half day course covers:
- The mandatory gateway
- Charging for parents with care and non-resident parents
- How child maintenance is calculated
- Updating of maintenance assessments
- Shared care arrangements
Conditionality and Sanctions
Single parents are subject to conditionality once their youngest child is one year old. This means they have tasks to perform in order to claim and remain entitled to benefits.
This course explains the pitfalls and how to avoid them by looking at:
- The benefit claiming process
- The Claimant commitment
- Sanctions and Hardship payments
Basic benefit knowledge is necessary to get the most out of the session.
Gingerbread’s new report, ‘Children deserve more: challenging child maintenance avoidance’ has just been published.
The report shows how the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) is unable and unwilling to ensure proper support for children. It highlights shows how current rules, and their implementation, mean many parents pay a fraction of what they can afford to support their children.
- The new CMS calculation falls short in assessing a paying parent’s income
- Recent reforms have made it harder to get a fairer payment
- The CMS leaves parents in the dark on their options – many give up.
Find out more and share the findings under #ChildrenDeserveMore.
The 1980 Education Act specifies that local authorities must make provision for the clothing of pupils who would otherwise be unable to afford school wear. At present local authorities are responsible for deciding the eligibility criteria, the grant amount and application process. CPAG, Poverty Truth Commission and OPFS believe the amounts set are not enough to adequately clothe children for school, leaving families on low income struggling to get by. We believe that there should be a statutory duty on local authorities and a minimum amount of school clothing grant established in statute to make progress towards a more realistic contribution towards the cost of school clothing.
The school clothing grant is a lifeline for many low income parents in Scotland. While parents on the lowest income can receive some help by way of a school clothing grant from their local authority, in many areas the grant available is nowhere near enough to cover even the most basic items. The grant offered by local authorities can vary widely from £20 to £110 (Appendix 1 of the briefing). Through our consultations with parents we know that thousands of families across Scotland are struggling to afford the clothes, shoes, bags and kit their children need to go to school.
Please fill in the survey here.
As a member of End Child Poverty (Scotland) OPFS warmly welcomes the Child Poverty (Scotland) Bill. We are extremely pleased that the Bill contains a duty to eradicate child poverty and that there are clear and identifiable targets about when this should be done. We particularly welcome the fact that the Bill proposes establishing four income based targets which will be measured after housing costs. We believe that focusing on income-based targets in this legislation is the correct approach.
OPFS also welcomes the publication of the Social Security Committee report on the Child Poverty (Scotland) Bill. In its Stage 1 report on the Bill, published on 22 May, 2017, the Social Security Committee issued recommendations for amendments. Along with other ECP members we believe many of the Committee’s recommendations would strengthen the Bill.
This briefing is produced by members of End Child Poverty (ECP) in Scotland including the Child Poverty Action Group, The Poverty Alliance, Barnardo’s Scotland, One Parent Families Scotland, Children 1st and Children in Scotland.
- We fully support the Child Poverty (Scotland) Bill. We also welcome the Social Security Committee Stage 1 report which makes a number of welcome recommendations.
- Progress towards the 2030 target will be more challenging unless there is a requirement that local authorities and health boards set out their strategic approach to tackling child poverty in their areas. The Bill should contain a duty which addresses this issue.
- We agree with the Committee that this is a framework Bill and that setting targets will not, of itself, reduce child poverty. Nevertheless, scrutiny of what measures are in place is essential. As such we welcome the committee’s recommendation that a commission should be established on a statutory footing. The Scottish Government’s proposed Poverty and Inequality Commission represents the opportunity to do this.
- We are particularly pleased that the Committee have recognised the need for interim targets towards 2030 target and that the delivery plans should have a set of key areas that Minister’s should have to include which were outlined by End Child Poverty.
The Stage 1 report from the Social Security committee represents another step towards ensuring that the Child Poverty (Scotland) Bill provides the most effective framework to contribute to tackling the poverty that affects increasing numbers of children and families. The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimate that relative child poverty will rise from 29 per cent in 2014–15 to 36% in 2021–22. That is why we believe that every aspect of efforts to tackle child poverty should be subject to scrutiny to ensure that what we are doing locally and nationally is effective. This briefing sets out three areas where End Child Poverty thinks the Bill could be strengthened at Stage 2.
The need for a strategic, forward-looking duty on local authorities and health boards
As it is currently drafted, the Child Poverty (Scotland) Bill 2017 places a duty on local authorities and health boards to produce “local child poverty action reports”. These reports would describe action taken in each local authority area in the last year for the purpose of contributing to the achievement of the child poverty targets. While incorporation of local authorities and health boards in the legislative framework is hugely welcome, we are concerned that section 10 is insufficient in that it is retrospective, requiring local authorities to describe what they have done rather than plan for future actions. ECP believe the key to meeting the 2030 target will be how local activity to tackle child poverty is linked to the actions that Scottish Ministers will take. A concerted national and local approach is vital. As such the legislation should ensure there is a clear duty on local authorities and health boards to take a strategic approach to reducing child poverty in their area – as well as reporting annually on the steps they have taken to achieve this.
We believe that the Bill could be amended to include a duty on local authorities and Health Boards which would require them – in association with their community planning partners – to set out what actions they will take to contribute to achieving the targets. These plans could be submitted to Ministers at the same time as the local child poverty action reports.
The need for independent scrutiny
End Child Poverty very much welcome the committee’s recommendation that a commission should be established in statute. We believe that there is an opportunity to do this with the proposed Poverty and Inequality Commission. We note the evidence from the Cabinet Secretary for Communities, Social Security and Equalities that timing of establishing a statutory commission could be an issue. We believe that establishing a commission as the Committee suggests would ensure the level of independence and resource required for the commission to be effective. As such it should be possible to set up shadow arrangements whilst the statutory requirements of appointments and other aspects are progressed. The Scottish Welfare Fund was established in the Welfare Funds (Scotland) Act 2015 and was operational before the legislation was enacted. The independence of a commission is vital. Oxfam Scotland in a recent report on what the Poverty and Inequality Commission would look like said “It should be fully independent of the Scottish Government, both in practice and perception. Consideration should be given to placing the commission on a statutory footing, with it reporting directly to the Scottish Parliament” As well as wider functions in relation to poverty and inequality the commission should advise Ministers’ on the level of interim targets, the development of delivery plan’s and report to parliament on the commission view of progress made towards meeting any interim target and the 2030 target.
End Child Poverty has made the case that the contents of the delivery plans are linked directly to achievement of the proposed child poverty targets. We believe that delivery plans should describe how the Scottish Government will use all of the major financial and policy tools at its disposal to progress towards these targets. We are therefore very pleased that the committee has recommended that the Scottish Government brings forward an amendment at Stage 2 to include the five areas suggested by End Child Poverty as being a requirement for inclusion in delivery plans.
These five areas are:
- the full use of Scottish social security powers
- the provision of information, advice and assistance to parents and carer in relation to welfare rights and income maximisation
- the provision of suitable and affordable housing
- the availability of childcare
- the facilitation of employment for parents and carers
The Scottish Government would then be obliged to set out in its delivery plan how action in each of the areas will contribute to the eradication of child poverty.
For more information contact: Eddie Follan
email@example.com Tel 07810854165
 Institute for Fiscal Studies. (2017). Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2016–17 to 2021–22.
 Oxfam Scotland: http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/building-a-more-equal-scotland-designing-scotlands-poverty-and-inequality-commi-620264